A2 Level Law Judicial Creativity Presentations 1. Doctrine of precedent - Duration. Judicial Review. Judicial Creativity in. Through a variety of techniques of judicial. Manner is applying the tools of creativity to forge the interpretation. Judges and Law Reform: Judicial Creativity or judicial activism? Judicial activism and judicial. The Tools And Techniques Of Judicial Creativity And Precedent A democratic society lives and swears by certain values such as individual liberty, human dignity, rule of law, constitutionalism etc. And it is the duty of the judiciary to so interpret the constitution and the law as to constantly inculcate these values on which democracy thrives.
- The Tools And Techniques Of Judicial Creativity And Precedent. Yakyuuken Special The Yakyuken Special is a Japanese game for the Sega Saturn by Societa Daikanyama. The gameplay involves playing games of rock, paper, scissors or Janken-Pon against 12.
- Choice between activism and restraint should be on the basis of a clear and clean policy.Judicial self restraint is a theory of judicial interpretation that encourages the judge to limit their exercise of power.And the major restraint in judicial creativity originates from the awarness of the need to maintain a balance among the three branches.
Legal reasoning is a method of thought and argument used by lawyers and judges when applying legal rules to specific interactions among legal persons. Legal reasoning in the case of a court’s ruling is found in the ‘Discussion or Analysis’ section of the judicial ruling.
It is here that the court gives reason for its legal ruling, and it helps other courts, lawyers and judges to use and follow the ruling in subsequent proceedings. Therefore, the ‘discussion or analysis’ section must be well reasoned and written.
Precedent and Analogy
The two central forms of legal reasoning are arguments from precedent and analogy. These are found in many legal systems such as the common law which is found in both England and the United States.
- Precedent is where an earlier decision is applied in a later case because the two cases are same.
- Analogy involves an earlier decision being used in a later case because the later case is similar to the earlier one.
Precedent and analogy do however present philosophical problems. For instance, when are two cases deemed ‘same’ so as to apply precedent? When two cases are considered ‘similar’ to justify analogy? In both situations, why should the decision in the earlier case affect the decision in the latter case?
Inherent within legal reasoning is the acceptance of the law and a leaning towards working within the existing legal framework. It is true to say that there is a bias towards maintaining the existing rules. Nevertheless, the bias does not presume the law as it is to be just, fair or practical and thus immune from change.
Judges have often in the past made use of provisions in the law to avoid applying precedent or analogy in instances where such an application would result in unfair or undesirable outcomes.
Elements of Legal Reasoning
Legal reasoning reveals why and how the court, lawyer or judge came to their decision or argument on the case.
There are core elements that must appear and be addressed in the reasoning:
- The question or the legal issue before the court
- The relevant facts of the case
- The legal rule
- Other considerations that may be brought before the court
As such, there is the burden to address the stated elements clearly and concisely. This may be done using a deductive or analytical reasoning.
Deductive Reasoning
This is a means of drawing out ruling from another judicial opinion, or existing constitution, legislative provision and applying it in another case. The rule statement is mostly broad rather than narrow when using deductive reasoning. This approach is mechanical and is therefore effective only in ideal situations and often unsatisfactory.
The approach faces many challenges among them being:
- Semantic difficulty – due to the various meanings that words hold, it is often impossible to attribute one particular meaning to a specific word and so to be understood by all parties
- There may arise unremunerated circumstances that would demand a different legal treatment
- The occurrence of obstacles preventing the upholding of previous rule statements
- Rules based on ontological principles being insufficient to determine between conflicting interests
Analogical Reasoning
This involves the identification of the similarities and differences of the facts in the precedential and the case to be determined. After the identification, then deciding whether the case to be determined is similar or different from the precedent in the important aspects with regards to the matter being decided. Following the findings, the case precedent may then be followed or distinguished.
It is important to note that there are peculiar situations where both of the above methods will not suffice in determining a case, and the judge may then rule according to personal preference.
![The tools and techniques of judicial creativity and precedent in india The tools and techniques of judicial creativity and precedent in india](/uploads/1/3/4/4/134487492/661564600.jpg)
Circumstances that may prompt such a treatment include but are not limited to:
- Where the law is obscure: the rules are too fragmentary, imprecise or partial to describe the present case facts
- Where there are no rules provided
The Lexis support site delivers troubleshooting tips, user guides, how-to videos, and answers to common questions. It’s also a great place to keep up to date on new enhancements. And if there’s a resource you need but can’t find, no problem!
Contact us for personalized assistance at
1-800-543-6862.
Lexis® Support Center1-800-543-6862.
Download and share these helpful Lexis guides. Ranging user benefits to handy hints, step-by-step instructions on how to complete common research tasks
In order to see our videos you need either JavaScript enabled or download/update your Flash plugin.
The Tools And Techniques Of Judicial Creativity And Precedent In India
Lexis Overview
Take a tour of Lexis features in this overview video.
Click here to view the full Show Me How video library.
You have many search options on Lexis. Just watch …
Click here to view the full Show Me How video library.
You have many search options on Lexis. Just watch …
Starting your Search on Lexis
You have many search options on Lexis. Just watch …
Explore Content on Lexis
Discover how you can quickly find the best sources to search with the Explore Content feature on Lexis.
Document Delivery on Lexis
Learn more on how you can share or deliver your best search results on Lexis.
Leveraging Favorites on Lexis®
Create shortcuts to your favorite search sources, filters and more. See how …
Basics of Alerts
Get updates on your topics of interest by setting up Alerts on Lexis.
Introduction to Search Term Maps
The Tools And Techniques Of Judicial Creativity And Precedent Decision
Assess case relevance with unprecedented speed with color-coded search terms. See Search Term Maps …
The Tools And Techniques Of Judicial Creativity And Precedent Differences
Using the Advanced Search Feature on Lexis
The Tools And Techniques Of Judicial Creativity And Precedent Definition
Let Lexis build a powerful search for you with fill-in-the-blank Advanced Search forms. Watch …